The law of
defamation protects people against untrue
statements
that could damage their reputation, and is
probably the
single most important area of law for any
journalist to
know about. One of the reasons for this is that defamation can affect
journalists in any field of work. If you work, for example, for a trade
magazine or in the women’s press, it’s quite possible that you will never need
to think
about court
reporting or official secrets after you’ve passed
your law
exams. But almost every kind of journalist, on
almost every
kind of publication, has the potential to
defame
someone, and some of the most high-profile
defamation
cases have involved quite small publications.
The second
reason why defamation is such an important part of the law for journalists is that
being successfully sued for it can be very expensive. Damages in defamation
cases are usually decided by juries; as a result, they are very unpredictable,
and can be extremely high. One
careless piece
of research or unchecked statement could end up costing a publisher tens of
thousands of pounds in damages – sometimes even hundreds of thousands – and as much
again, sometimes more, in legal fees. Big national papers can absorb such
losses (though decreasing circulations mean even they find it difficult), but
for smaller magazines, losing a libel case can be disastrous. The magazine Living Marxism was actually forced
into liquidation after being order to pay damages of £375,000 in a libel case
in 2000. Because of this, most publishers are very nervous of libel actions.
One result of this is that, faced with a threat of libel, even where the
journalist
believes that the story is legally sound,
many
publishers will choose not to run it, or to water it down. In this way the
threat of a libel action can be used to prevent publication of stories that
really ought to be
brought to the
public’s attention. Similarly, many
publishers,
faced with a complaint about a story that has
already been
published, will back down, print an apology and if necessary, agree to pay some
compensation, rather than allow the case to go to court and risk huge legal
costs
and possibly
damages. In fact most libel claims are settled out of court, and court hearings
are rare. None of this means that journalists should be so scared of being sued
that we never write anything that upsets anyone, but it does mean that every
journalist needs to understand
thoroughly the
basic rules of this area of the law – not just
so that you
know what not to write or say, but because defamation law does give some
protection to press
freedom, and by
knowing the rules, you can often safely
say more than
you might imagine. Many newspapers
and magazines
publish potentially defamatory material every day but by making sure that what
they print is covered by one of several defenses to defamation, they can do so
safely.
No comments:
Post a Comment